Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail
#4
(05-02-2010, 02:03 PM)billy Wrote:  on the face of it it seems okay to me.

i see these are all dems.
i'd have thought obama would agree with it also.

i thought you were for the good ole boys benny.

that said. i think it's got to be a bit more than the 20 sheets.
what about if wells fargo simply divests it's balance sheet into ten smaller companies with wells fargo as the conglomerate head. (it's called a loophole.)

thats why a 20 sheeter won't cut it. too many loopholes.
Aparently there are no loop holes. Wells will have to break up into smaller companies that can not be owned or controlled by the same.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by Benny2guns - 05-02-2010, 12:45 PM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by srijantje - 05-02-2010, 01:35 PM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by billy - 05-02-2010, 02:03 PM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 01:50 AM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by billy - 05-03-2010, 10:34 AM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 10:44 AM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by billy - 05-03-2010, 11:12 AM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 02:12 PM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by billy - 05-03-2010, 05:03 PM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 06:17 PM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by mrmod - 05-03-2010, 10:22 PM
RE: Getting Rid Of Too Big To Fail - by billy - 05-04-2010, 09:17 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!