05-23-2017, 12:26 PM
(05-22-2017, 11:14 AM)rayheinrich Wrote:(05-22-2017, 11:01 AM)billy Wrote: on gaslights behalf, his proxy so to speak; a scientist by training is someone who hasn't trained
in any of the sciences. a coal man possibly or a seamstress.
@gaslight: billy is why no additional terror is required.

I can see I'll have to choose my words carefully around here. That... makes sense! All in the spirit of good practice, I am absolutely sure

signed warmly,
Elise, PhD

(05-22-2017, 06:49 AM)rayheinrich Wrote:All of this is lovely to hear, Ray. Thank you! To your last point, I shopped around a bit for forums before jumping in anywhere and this place is a clear winner. Thanks to all, particularly mods, for continuing to nurture such a gem!(05-22-2017, 03:22 AM)thegaslights Wrote: Wow, thanks all! As a scientist by training, I've been apprehensive about diving in to the critiques. It's so nice to have reassurance there! I'm very much looking forward to posting my poetry, and plan to avoid terrorizing. Too much. Or at least on purpose. Really!
Excellent, poetry needs more people with scientific training.
Logical analysis is integral to critique, as far-too-many poems lack a logical structure.
While linear narrative is totally unnecessary (none usually being the best choice);
illogical connections, inaccurate meanings, and just plain old slushing-about are all too common.
And on the writing side of it, it's vital. For poems to communicate, the need to contain information
(even if encrypted).
PigPen is one of the few places on the internet where your poems can get a peer (or better) revue.
Welcome,
Ray
- Elise