04-29-2010, 06:28 AM
i've read that one among others dan.
why i mention the conspiracy theorist is just that. he talks and peole believe him.
in this case it was about blackmail and homosexuality.
why on earth should someone have to declare they'r a homosexual, in this case we're are told, to stop blackmail. is homosexuality a crime now? i can think of many more things one can be blackmailed over worse than ones sexuality. but it's the sexuality they bring up because they think with their bigoted minds it's something dirty.
the same with obama. they the theorist who work for the right wing of consrvatism, they don't tell the truth they don't even want to tell the truth. all they want is to plant seeds of doubt. they don't have to show any proof of their accusations yet they scream for proof to prove them wrong.
thats why i mentioned the infowars guy. inuendo and gossip mongering and gobshite talk is where he makes his money. to him this is not only a personal imaginary conspiracy, he makes his money from spreading the shit.
i mention it because his is the radio station the op sited his first with as source.
i'm attacking the source as unreliable bullshit.
it seems out of the whole of the media this nut job is someone the op expects us to believe because it's someone he believes.
and i agree with you when you say;
If "they" (whoever they are, all I've been hearing is "they") had as much power as this article and others suggest, then the world would be a much much more unfair place.
why i mention the conspiracy theorist is just that. he talks and peole believe him.
in this case it was about blackmail and homosexuality.
why on earth should someone have to declare they'r a homosexual, in this case we're are told, to stop blackmail. is homosexuality a crime now? i can think of many more things one can be blackmailed over worse than ones sexuality. but it's the sexuality they bring up because they think with their bigoted minds it's something dirty.
the same with obama. they the theorist who work for the right wing of consrvatism, they don't tell the truth they don't even want to tell the truth. all they want is to plant seeds of doubt. they don't have to show any proof of their accusations yet they scream for proof to prove them wrong.
thats why i mentioned the infowars guy. inuendo and gossip mongering and gobshite talk is where he makes his money. to him this is not only a personal imaginary conspiracy, he makes his money from spreading the shit.
i mention it because his is the radio station the op sited his first with as source.
i'm attacking the source as unreliable bullshit.
it seems out of the whole of the media this nut job is someone the op expects us to believe because it's someone he believes.
and i agree with you when you say;
If "they" (whoever they are, all I've been hearing is "they") had as much power as this article and others suggest, then the world would be a much much more unfair place.