02-11-2017, 02:24 PM
@lizziep: i can't. dark field microscopy is the name of the actual process, and bright is enough. as for "resolution is improved", it's "at cost of color", so the deflation of poetry mode is intended big time. thanks for the feedback!
@achebe: no idea about relativity intruding here, so i can't answer that. the comment on wave particle duality is mostly there because this was written as a sort of response to an earlier piece, so without alternatives, i can't offer a non-biased answer to that. as well, i also have no idea about x-rays here; as noted, both extratextuality, within the text, and by the title itself, the process is about dark field microscopy. my field isn't physics, so i have a far more practical knowledge of the concepts discussed here -- may be the reason why you're associating with concepts barely defined for me. may need elaboration.
as for the meaning, again i'm gonna be biased here and say that this is meant to work in conjunction with an earlier piece, linked above. i'm not gonna tie the two into one mega-piece as i did with a couple of earlier stabs, however, since if they were to ever be presented they have to be separated by the gulf of time, ie by either narrative or other, more colorful pieces. such an interpretation, i think, hinges on what is effectively a coming of age, a dulling of the senses, but i bet there's something slighter there that i have no idea is actually there (whether good or bad, too, i have no idea). thanks for the feedback!
again, thanks for the feedback!
@achebe: no idea about relativity intruding here, so i can't answer that. the comment on wave particle duality is mostly there because this was written as a sort of response to an earlier piece, so without alternatives, i can't offer a non-biased answer to that. as well, i also have no idea about x-rays here; as noted, both extratextuality, within the text, and by the title itself, the process is about dark field microscopy. my field isn't physics, so i have a far more practical knowledge of the concepts discussed here -- may be the reason why you're associating with concepts barely defined for me. may need elaboration.
as for the meaning, again i'm gonna be biased here and say that this is meant to work in conjunction with an earlier piece, linked above. i'm not gonna tie the two into one mega-piece as i did with a couple of earlier stabs, however, since if they were to ever be presented they have to be separated by the gulf of time, ie by either narrative or other, more colorful pieces. such an interpretation, i think, hinges on what is effectively a coming of age, a dulling of the senses, but i bet there's something slighter there that i have no idea is actually there (whether good or bad, too, i have no idea). thanks for the feedback!
again, thanks for the feedback!