02-01-2017, 11:52 AM
Thanks for the feedback! Yeah, it's not meant to go any deeper than this baby-hatin', free-lovemakin' fag's complaint, so the cycling of logic is meant to be -- though as for the Bible having linear logic, I don't think so. It's hemispherical at best -- Adam close to God, Adam and his blood falling, Christ the new Adam raising up Adam and his fallen blood -- though considering the open-ended nature of Revelations (I'd like to think that "forever" is a relative term, insomuch as the early Church, through no fault of their own, believed that the Christ would return "soon") and the various ups and downs the Jewish people went through throughout history, there is the implication, hidden perhaps because the Abrahamic religions *love being so different*, or, better still, because the opposite arc is fundamentally a mystery, something that if fleshed out in text would lead only to a trap. But that's my personal take on it, and I'm naught but an armchair scholar.
On line six: agreed. Will think of something.
On line eight: I suppose that's the point where the speaker's skewering spreads its range, the implication being that it's the folks safe and secure in their inland homes/votes that are destroying the world, that are losing their souls. Where exactly do you think the line fails, though, at "country voters", or at its key thought, "roast Christ's paradise"?
Again, thanks for the feedback!
On line six: agreed. Will think of something.
On line eight: I suppose that's the point where the speaker's skewering spreads its range, the implication being that it's the folks safe and secure in their inland homes/votes that are destroying the world, that are losing their souls. Where exactly do you think the line fails, though, at "country voters", or at its key thought, "roast Christ's paradise"?
Again, thanks for the feedback!