10-12-2016, 08:46 PM
if it gave me $3.25 every time i visited the serious forum, it would work for me.
If you want the serious forum to have only in depth replies, easiest thing to do would set a character count limit..
e.g., let's say the average poem is 500 characters... , make the replies require 1500 characters. Then at least people would have to do a lot more bullshitting.
my opinion is that let the poet post where he wants, and let the critiquer choose how to respond. And the poet can get over their "that's a shit critique" pretentious attitude.
The guy who starts it is the one who responds to the critique and not to the poem.
If you want the serious forum to have only in depth replies, easiest thing to do would set a character count limit..
e.g., let's say the average poem is 500 characters... , make the replies require 1500 characters. Then at least people would have to do a lot more bullshitting.
my opinion is that let the poet post where he wants, and let the critiquer choose how to respond. And the poet can get over their "that's a shit critique" pretentious attitude.
The guy who starts it is the one who responds to the critique and not to the poem.