Andrey's questions about poems (split from the intro thread)

[AndreyGaganov]

(2) existing for existence's sake - two different things (the latter of which, obviously, makes no sense at all).

Why does it make no sense at all? What are the axioms you are using to construct your argument? You are just making an arbitrary statement and presenting that as logically thought through. It's rubbish.

EDIT: existing for the pleasure of existing == existing not to convey information, but to provide auditory and visual stimuli through the use of words that have an effect on certain areas of the brain that respond to language and music. 
It's pretty obvious shorthand. If you did not get it, it could be because i) you are not familiar with the expression ii) you're trying to split hairs and come off as a smart dude. I hope it's (i).

No, I'm not familiar with the expression. I've no idea how (ii) could work.