09-12-2016, 08:50 AM
(09-12-2016, 08:40 AM)AndreyGaganov Wrote:And thus you prove that due to your inability to understand metaphor, the fundamental building block of poetry, you probably should give up and go back to jingle writing or whatever is easier for you to manage.(09-12-2016, 08:29 AM)Leanne Wrote:Your reply has to do with a physical perception, a condition no one can do anything about (supposedly). My concern here is with the sonic/musical aspect of poetry. I really don't know how you can connect these two dots.(09-12-2016, 08:26 AM)AndreyGaganov Wrote: Also, before I forget: rayheinrich mentioned the sound and the rhythm, the musical aspect of reading poetry aloud. Well, as someone who's been listening to music half his life, to me singing is musical; reciting a poem with a speaking tone isn't. You never see/hear someone telling a poet: "Jesus Christ, that was a horrible voice. Let this guy/girl do the reading." or someone telling a singer "Your voice stinks, but that was a great song. Here's your fifty bucks." I think I get the 'rhythm' part, but the 'sound' part ... not really. I suppose the logic here is: anyone can read poetry, no matter how good or bad the voice is. Well, where's the music in that?Can't even begin to comment on that. If a colour-blind man sees only shades of grey, does that make the sky less blue to others?
It could be worse