09-05-2016, 12:30 AM
(08-15-2016, 06:39 AM)next Wrote:I had to read it twice before I appreciated it fully(08-15-2016, 04:56 AM)ellajam Wrote:(08-15-2016, 04:12 AM)lizziep Wrote: Next,The Pen belongs to its members, feel free to riot in the streets, the worst that can happen is a boot in the Arse.
I love Emily & Sylvia!
Their fans are here,
but we hide in fear
of the poetry police.
I haven't read the bell jar in 40 years but I picked up a copy not long ago, haven't opened it but it's around. Emily sure has her gems.
I read the Bell Jar in the late 70's, years after her suicide and in the midst of a resurgent tide of feminism.
Because of that context, I was prepared to love it. Maybe I expected too much, maybe I missed its finer points,
but I was disappointed. Only the parts dealing with mental illness stood out to me. It would be interesting to read it
again after so many years, but I have a long list of other books and most of them are above it. (I later found the
feminism I had yearned for contained within the poetry of Adrienne Rich.)
I picked it up because I knew it dealt with mental illness and gender relations and so on, but she's kind of bizarrely nonchalant about them. The story's predominately personal, which is why I missed it's quality the first time through. Now, I cry. A lot. I give it a fried chicken and caviar out of a possible ten.

