04-19-2010, 12:30 PM
Thats all well and good and makes sense. Problem is as I see it is this.
They have the right at birth, it was given as a means to protect the republic from all enemies foreign and domestic. It can not be taken away or changed, if it is tried they have the right to spill blood to protect it that one can not be changed either. The men that wrote the constitution were some of the most clever people that lived.
There is no arguement that I have heard that will convince me that removing any of or changeing any of them is good for the republic or the freedom for which it stands.
No I don't live there but I have family that does.
Robbers and criminals be damned, you can not scare people into giving up their rights and freedoms. It may blind side them for a short bit but in the end you will not get away with it.
They have the right at birth, it was given as a means to protect the republic from all enemies foreign and domestic. It can not be taken away or changed, if it is tried they have the right to spill blood to protect it that one can not be changed either. The men that wrote the constitution were some of the most clever people that lived.
There is no arguement that I have heard that will convince me that removing any of or changeing any of them is good for the republic or the freedom for which it stands.
No I don't live there but I have family that does.
Robbers and criminals be damned, you can not scare people into giving up their rights and freedoms. It may blind side them for a short bit but in the end you will not get away with it.