03-27-2016, 02:52 PM
Another mistake? Dangit, I know I'm better than that. xD
Actually, this time the "were" was somewhat intentional. Not only does it sound better, but I was sort of aiming for royal plural, like "We are not amused", because, you know, the Word. But of course, I still knew it was sorta wrong (best example of course is the Gospel of John), and now that you've caught me, I'll go ahead and change it.
Actually, this time the "were" was somewhat intentional. Not only does it sound better, but I was sort of aiming for royal plural, like "We are not amused", because, you know, the Word. But of course, I still knew it was sorta wrong (best example of course is the Gospel of John), and now that you've caught me, I'll go ahead and change it.