05-21-2015, 05:45 AM
Harsh.
As for the grammar in the beginning, "she" is singular, agreement with single verb "is", and a plural predicate nominative. It's just subject-verb agreement, and a metaphor. The "she" is not Gemini, the "she" is the subject of the poem, which I thought was implied, but evidently not.
So besides that the criticism was, caps, and too abstracted.
I'll not auto-cap in the future, though there are contemporary poets who do so, so whether I should or not ought to be a stylistic decision.
As for abstraction, a valid critique. What do you guys think of T. S. Eliot's poetry?
Thanks for the critiques.
As for the grammar in the beginning, "she" is singular, agreement with single verb "is", and a plural predicate nominative. It's just subject-verb agreement, and a metaphor. The "she" is not Gemini, the "she" is the subject of the poem, which I thought was implied, but evidently not.
So besides that the criticism was, caps, and too abstracted.
I'll not auto-cap in the future, though there are contemporary poets who do so, so whether I should or not ought to be a stylistic decision.
As for abstraction, a valid critique. What do you guys think of T. S. Eliot's poetry?
Thanks for the critiques.