05-19-2015, 07:07 AM
(05-18-2015, 03:07 AM)Todd Wrote: The future is not unmovingSo, there is a grammar error here which unhinges it a bit. In addition, after reading it a few times, I grew annoyed at the gimickey line breaks. One or two in a poem that point to your central metaphor and everyone is applauding your cleverness as a poet and handing you plaques and canned hams but after a while they scream, "look at me, the clever poet!"
cranes in the secret
origami language
of gingham skirted oracles.
I liked "origami language". With the strength of that, do you really need "secret"? You should probably hyphenate "gingham-skirted". I wonder if you just wanted to use the word gingham in a poem. As a whole, this section is over-weighted with modification. There should be a way to say this simply and more elegantly.
Quote:It is also not to be found
in gray brick, or frozen
clocks.
"It is also not to be found" - this is pretty clunky. The odd strophe break reminds me of leanne's clever "white space" white space but unfortunately, not in a flattering way as it feels unnatural here. Certainly there is something to be said about the future not being found in clocks - what a great, simple statement you have trapped here almost impossible to find.
Quote:The horizon cannot be pressed
into so small a square
to escape you can only breathe
once again, there is cleverness here but it is trapped by clunkiness - "The horizon cannot be pressed into so small" - this is just clunky verbiage
Quote:in the blue of the sky,
unfold in aerodynamic lines
and fly.
So, I am quite in the air on this one. The voice is wholly your own and it is one I have become quite used to and quite fond of reading. As well, there are some clever thoughts and turns of phrase here. That being said, the modification feels overdone and the line breaks feel gimmickey.

