05-04-2015, 02:39 PM
(05-03-2015, 06:47 AM)crow Wrote: I've been spending 10–15 hours a week revising my lyrics primer, and here's a piece of what's likely to be absolute crap that I'd like to include. It seems right to me, but I think I'm not being objective.
It's this:
There are only four kinds of songs:
(1) identity formation and assertion songs (I'm X; lots of rap, for instance),
(2) maintaining balance songs (to keep thing X, thing Y needs to be dialed back; Missing the War, Ben Folds),
(3) aggressive idiosyncratic pursuit songs (I'm going all in; New York, New York);
(4) idiosyncratic unhealthy pursuit songs/Faustian bargain songs (a personal strength/asset becomes a weakness/liability; Billy Joel's Piano Man), and
(5) the rest are "merely atmospheric" songs (tone lyrics; Beck's "Loser").
The question is, is this an exhaustive list? If you think it isn't, please point me to an exception, if you can think of one.
1. You list 5 not 4, and the 5th is very close to being a catch-all:
"There are only three colors: 'red', 'green', and 'other'.
2. The attributes that define the categories are inconsistent:
"There are only three colors: 'red', 'green', and 'bright'.
3. The categories are ambiguous, they depend too heavily on subjective interpretation;
"There are only three colors: 'kind of redish', 'sort of greenish', and 'somewhat otherish'.
4. The categories are presented as (probably) all-inclusive:
Is this lemon 'red' or 'green'?
5. On the plus side these categories provide the basis for amusingly illogical discussions:
"That lemon is RED!" "No, NO, it's GREEN!"
There's more, but I need to get back to listening to my Gregorian chants followed by
the Magic Flute. Or was that Carmen?
As sincerely crabby as ever,
ray
all this useless beauty... but what the hell, why not?

