02-24-2015, 02:33 PM
Ray,
Yes I did read it, it was the only one I did read. Read it because I knew you would ask me about it. A con based on embarrassment somehow seems honest!
We had no duality before Descartes and Newton. That is before then everything was all smashed up. I suspects it was because they did not have a good grip on gravity. Prior to Descartes et. al., the only duality was good and evil; although literally God and evil. Something either had the nature of God, or the nature of Satan. Now we are trying to go beyond duality, by going backwards, but there will always be PB & J.
dale
Yes I did read it, it was the only one I did read. Read it because I knew you would ask me about it. A con based on embarrassment somehow seems honest!
We had no duality before Descartes and Newton. That is before then everything was all smashed up. I suspects it was because they did not have a good grip on gravity. Prior to Descartes et. al., the only duality was good and evil; although literally God and evil. Something either had the nature of God, or the nature of Satan. Now we are trying to go beyond duality, by going backwards, but there will always be PB & J.
dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.

