Deleuzean Villanelle

[Brownlie]

Deleuze dealt with the liminal nature of sense and two types of nonsense (structured nonsense you would find in Carroll and nonsense that deteriorates into a total loss of meaning, or true madness). Deleuze also had the rhizome which deals with various nodes of deterritorialization, so theoretically it is not necessarily dependent on a linear order but centers around a core. (The metaphor is in a rhizome as opposed to a traditional root metaphor).  Deconstructionists deal with the in-between, and Deleuze has a three part register: the virtual (the idea which forms a template), Intensive (qualitative shifts), and the Actual (Individuations).(I'm iffy on this, but I believe shifts occur at a point of singularity but they do not necessarily mark a synchronic ossification.)Deleuze also draw from Bergeson's idea of difference which seems to be summed up the way we assimilate a flock of sheep into a whole. The hurricanoe is King Lear, an infamous madman in literature. The execution here, in my opinion, is suspect. For instance, the coherence is probably hindered by the refrains. Molt of Shake-skin = a temporary coating that results from dawning the works of Shakespeare. Pronouncing Shake-skin, however, may cause problems with the coherence.

I see. very interesting, indeed.

sorry for such a short reply, but Deleuze, being my primary field of study at university and subject of three dissertations, has infested every philosophical thought I have had since that I begin to feel like a cancerous BwO at the mere thought of a discussion about it

Well, to be honest, I don't know that much about it, but I thought it would be interesting in a villanelle. It's a nice change for me, compared to some of the enlightenment philosophy I've had to read. (I suppose its really classified as post-structuralism or postmodern as the BwO would suggest). In an ironic twist, the BwO is just another organ in the Norton Universe/corpus (from my view).