05-16-2014, 01:53 AM
"If you can't see it how can you claim it's real?" oxygen, gravity, wind, motion, inspiration, a logical argument.
"If you can't feel it how can you believe the faith in it" Do you mean, if you can't feel it, how can you trust it? Do you mean physical feeling (touch), or emotional feeling (emotions)?
"And now, when you are thinking about these two previous questions, you are actually neglecting the fact that He exists, making you - a non-believer whatsoever."
False premiss: If one contemplates something counter to what they believe it does not invalidate their belief. It only makes them not closed minded. Plus, I am thinking you are much to prideful about your two "questions" to believe that they could have such an effect.
Yes, I have to agree with Tom, this is a mess, a logical and a grammatical one. Plus, it reads more as a bad philosophical treatise (well a short one), than a poem, in my opinion.
Dale
"If you can't feel it how can you believe the faith in it" Do you mean, if you can't feel it, how can you trust it? Do you mean physical feeling (touch), or emotional feeling (emotions)?
"And now, when you are thinking about these two previous questions, you are actually neglecting the fact that He exists, making you - a non-believer whatsoever."
False premiss: If one contemplates something counter to what they believe it does not invalidate their belief. It only makes them not closed minded. Plus, I am thinking you are much to prideful about your two "questions" to believe that they could have such an effect.
Yes, I have to agree with Tom, this is a mess, a logical and a grammatical one. Plus, it reads more as a bad philosophical treatise (well a short one), than a poem, in my opinion.
Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.