03-26-2010, 08:47 AM
(03-26-2010, 08:34 AM)SidewaysDan Wrote:Fair enough Dan but I disagree with that view. If there were no money to be made there would be no war. Paper money is but an I O U Dan. The term needs to be refined to wealth or power or resources or personal gain, the word money is a great deceiver.(03-26-2010, 08:22 AM)Benny2guns Wrote: What about Hitler? Was that ww2 or ...ya it was. It was totally about money, who had it and who wanted it. More over power, who had it and who wanted it. Where did the financing come from? Follow the financing in any of these wars and find the same people holding the purse strings and on both sides. Thats pretty much known fact if you look. I could be wrong Dan, but I am pretty sure man.*Going a bit off-topic here but it's a healthy discussion*
Sure, there was money involved. There was power involved and things were brewing up for a War. But you cannot say that WWII was fought especifically for money alone. Wars don't just start from one single reason.
That's why I don't believe the Iraq "War" to be a real war (technically speaking). It was just an invasion and yes for money.
So I do agree with you. Wherever there's war - there's alot money. But I refuse to agree that money is the single cause of every war.
I stand firm in that statement, no wars will been fought if personal wealth were not to be gained. It is the only reason for any war.
Blair and all of the rest of them profit from it and try to conceal it because the more information the comman man has on the topic the more likly it is that this kill us for gain scheme will be put to an end.
Personally I do not beleive this to be off topic.
