03-19-2014, 02:32 PM
(03-19-2014, 02:19 PM)rayheinrich Wrote:It would have been nice if you had addressed the ugly, the socially awkward and the surprisingly large group of individuals that shows no sexual proclivity at all as none of them are protectected classes in our new equal rights and marriage for all scenario.
I can't believe I just read this whole damn thread.
Most of the pro-gay stuff I would have said has
already been said quite well, but seein' as how
I'm here I thought I'd post these thoughts:
Laws regulating the marriage of Gay Animals:
For mutual interactions to be ethical, the informed
consent of both parties is required. This limits
ethical bestiality to a handful (pun intended)
of species. (Humans, of course, aren't one of them.)
Civil rights laws:
Enforceable laws require realistically measurable
(cheap etc.) criteria. This inevitably requires
generalization which guarantees inequality.
The most important criterion of any civil rights
law is that the equality it creates must be greater
than the inequality it creates. This criterion, by
the way, is NOT realistically measurable.
Incest laws:
Laws that prohibit incest (when viewed rationally),
are public health laws that are based on the increased
likelihood of genetic faults. When the precise testing
of DNA for these faults becomes available, these laws
will become unnecessary on scientific grounds. A law
similar to the current laws in a few U.S. states that
require a blood test for venereal disease before a
marriage license is granted would be sufficient.
In the future, these laws will certainly be considered
a violation of civil rights and will be opposed by
incest rights groups.
I once met a fine creature from Venus,
Who resembled a hundred-foot penis;
To spread fear and awe
I'd eject from its maw
Ninety million on YouTube have seen us.
Ah, hell with it, lump them together with the bestials, incestuals, killers and dissidents on the unapproved list.
(How do we feel about polygamy, btw?)
I thought I had read somewhere that smoking increases birth defects more than incest, BTW which is why it is illegal for smokers to marry. Oh, wait. It's not? Any chance of adding smokers to the unapproved list, I don't like them much anyway?


),