03-19-2014, 05:39 AM
(03-19-2014, 05:30 AM)milo Wrote:I don't think I have the right to disapprove of any relationship between two consenting adults. Montegue or Capulet, we are all equal in that sense, to choose our own mate. Gotogo...(03-19-2014, 05:19 AM)ChristopherSea Wrote:So, carrying the argument further, we agree that if we don't approve of the relationship than they are not entitled to equality?(03-19-2014, 05:15 AM)milo Wrote: At this point I would just like to have it established that we have agreed it is "all about equality" as long as it is a familial relationship that we all approve of. After we agree that is what we are actually saying, maybe we can continue to discuss why it really isn't about quality at all.Yes, I was beginning to think that 'I Love Ewe' had a special meaning for you.
(03-19-2014, 05:39 AM)ChristopherSea Wrote:(03-19-2014, 05:30 AM)milo Wrote:I don't think I have the right to disapprove of any relationship between two consenting adults. Montegue or Capulet, we are all equal in that sense, to choose our own mate. Gotogo...(03-19-2014, 05:19 AM)ChristopherSea Wrote: Yes, I was beginning to think that 'I Love Ewe' had a special meaning for you.So, carrying the argument further, we agree that if we don't approve of the relationship than they are not entitled to equality?
I see your exercise in logic and basis for argument, but it does not wash. Abuse of animals is not a relationship. There are laws against it. Those laws apply equally to the animal protector and the abuser. Just as their are laws preventing the serial killer from legally slaying humans, they apply to the rest of us. He suffers no inequality. You may as well argue that criminals suffer from inequality because the laws are against their way of life.
My new watercolor: 'Nightmare After Christmas'/Chris

