(warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences
#7
I understand that "Kant and Nietzsche are intentionally' misspelled. What I don't understand is why?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe I'm being dense, but I don't get what

"some equational bullshit combination
of your college sweetheart
and two-point-six or so squalling messes"
---------------------------------------------------------
The metaphor seems a tad convoluted here:

"You are fire
and he is only the first
so if he tries to drown you
let him burn
and go on"

"Shouldn't it be burn him and then go?" Or if you mean burn with lust, I think you need to make that more clear. As of now, for me anyway, it seems ambiguous.
----------------------------------------------------------

Overall, I would like to see this fleshed out more, so we can see more of the person and situation you are talking about. This basically comes across like one side of a telephone conversation, with the reader having no idea with who the speaker is speaking, what their background is, or what the speaker's relationship to them is.


Best,

Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?

The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: (warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences - by rowens - 02-21-2014, 11:34 AM
RE: (warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences - by rowens - 02-21-2014, 11:51 AM
RE: (warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences - by rowens - 02-21-2014, 11:58 AM
RE: (warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences - by Erthona - 02-21-2014, 01:15 PM
RE: (warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences - by rowens - 02-21-2014, 11:56 PM
RE: (warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences - by rowens - 02-22-2014, 01:36 AM
RE: (warning: expletives) Six Years of Differences - by rowens - 02-22-2014, 03:36 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!