11-25-2013, 02:07 AM
(11-24-2013, 06:43 PM)jdvanwijk Wrote: Hello Milo,I am pleased to see you eliminate an "of" statement - your instincts are correct, they always weaken poems. I am surprised I didn't point it out, I was going to post a whole discussion thread about my hatred of "of" in poems.
I've tried several different things with the first verse, and now agree with you that "as the trains crashed by" just sounds a lot better. And there's a slight ambiguity to it that I now find kind of interesting. (Was it a game? Or were they scared of the trains? Or maybe the brothers were fighting (howling at each other) for hours?)
An important change in the second verse; what do you think?
I have the feeling that the last five lines can be more effective, I'm going to experiment with it some more.
All best!
Jan
I am liking your changes. Last five lines could probably use a little work. Take your time, experiment some, don't forget you can always go back if you change your mind.
I am curious about "topped" now, is there a word that means the same that points to your central metaphor - maybe "buried" or "covered" or something along those lines.
(11-25-2013, 01:18 AM)trueenigma Wrote: Good job with the edits so far. I still would really like to see something a little more solid than support in S2. I know that you feel the abstract "support" is holding your metaphor up, but bridge trusses all carry their own symbolism, and hold mystical properties: column, post, cable, wire, strut, arch, beam, pillar, tower...Which best describes your support?I actually prefer the word "support", it is a common enough term and gives the double meaning. As far as other words, it is tough to say without seeing them - column might work, though not as well as support, truss or cable wouldn't, neither would arch, span would be a great word to work into the poem but not as a substitute. Pillar might work as well but it would change the focus of the whole poem - it would immediately become important /who/ died where now it is not.

