Interpretation...is it valid critique?
#76
(09-19-2013, 10:24 AM)milo Wrote:  
(09-19-2013, 10:18 AM)abu nuwas Wrote:  
(09-19-2013, 10:03 AM)milo Wrote:  I do not agree that art or the creation of art is subjective. I agree that the appreciation or consumption of art can be subjective and even the identification but even those three rather broad statements are not universal. Iowa, art is not subjective, that is just another tired cliché
I can supply you with the information, I can't supply you with more. Did you ever notice how often a cliché is said to be 'tired'?

You have no opinion but your own. Ergo, in your opinion art is not subjective. You don't sense that there is a non sequitur in that simple proposition? Take care: you may be deemed to be one of the thickos who have to be told to fuck off.
You didn't provide information you provided the same old cliche as axiomatic. Please provide this information to support the rediculous position.
No. Had you been able to understand, you would have. I prefer bed. (You were spelling 'ridiculous' incorrectly, weren't you? As a joke? Otherwise, perhaps the door is nearer than you think. If you can find it, that is. I couldn't.)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Interpretation...is it valid critique? - by rowens - 09-13-2013, 11:07 PM
RE: Interpretation...is it valid critique? - by rowens - 09-14-2013, 05:28 AM



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!