where is Osama?

[cigarbabe]

Read more about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

So where is your proof? How did it happen once let alone 3 times? Please, I would like to know what supports your belief of the official story.

How about the intense heat from the gallons of jet fuel?
Couple that with buildings were never built to withstand the kind of damage inflicted on it by
the plane crashing, jet fuel fires with very intense heat and debris from the plane would create a conduit for the burning of those fires.

The building frame would collapse under it's own weight Benny with those kind of pressures.
No conspiracy theory necessary.
Here's the proof
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technolo...tml?page=4
C.B.

Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to fatigue the steel mains to cause the collapse as it happened. Thats a proven and well known fact.
All of them would need to go in a precise pattern floor by floor to bring it straight down at near free fall. Thats another proven and well known fact. 3 buildings came down the same way not just the one.
I am sorry but that link proves nothing. Jet fuel would indeed heat them in the aera of the impact but the fire was not burning long enough to accomplish what FEMA (lol) claims. Fire fighters themselves have stated the fires were for the most part out. There are to many experts that agree the buildings were pulled.
Why was all the steel hauled away and disposed of before anyone could examine it for trace evidence. I do not beleive a word of a report from FEMA of all places.
EDIT: Those 2 towers were indeed built to sustain damage from an airliner crashing into them and by more than just one strike I might add, thats well published info by the way.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html

First of all neither I nor the article provided ever say that the burning jet fuel would be hot enough to melt a steel frame. Debunking Benny #1
The wtc towers did come down the same way by "pancaking" from the weight of the debris and floors on top of each other. Debunking Benny #2
Nothing was carted away before it was examined Benny if you watched the proceedings as I did or saw the way it fell in real time as I did you would know that the fires were most certainly not out after the explosions.
What common sense will tell you if a building is filled with fuel that found a spark like oh say PAPER, furniture, and carpeting it is going to burn like a motherfucker conspiracy theories aside it doesn't just go out by itself it burns Benny Boo it burns!
It is apparent to me you couldn't have possibly read all ten plus pages and discounted all of the reports from different agencies. Not all of them are associated with Fema mind you but if you want to believe in hocus pocus by all means and lest we forget all of the proof from the nut cases please provide the links from your reliable sources dearest. I'm going to bet that your proof comes from a nut site like AttackonAmerica.net or some other clone of it.

Here are some of Attack on Americas claim's;

"Melted" Steel
Claim: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength — and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.


So there you go Benny boo.
This concludes my "Debunking of Benny's conspiracy theories" part 1
C.B.