07-29-2013, 01:33 PM
(07-29-2013, 01:30 PM)R.C. KITCHENS Wrote:These finer details can be worked out if there is enough interest.(07-29-2013, 01:22 PM)milo Wrote:Yeah, the curiosity of who the poet is makes for a draw. 50 post's seems sufficient as most poets who don't critique eventually go away or are three day banned. would the poem be for serious workshopping? or just any type of critique? maybe a guideline of the type of critique were looking to attain would be good too.(07-29-2013, 01:17 PM)R.C. KITCHENS Wrote: can we comment on this poll anonymously?........Good callout - yes, there would be requirements. I am thinking minimum 50 posts with a healthy comment ratio and at least some history of taking feedback and using it to revise a poem.
---what do you mean by "posting critiquing option" that possible critiques can be anonymous?
I think the idea could catch grounding. There might need be a posts requirement though.
No anonymous critiquing, but you would be critiquing a poem without having any idea who the author was. Might even be fun to take a guess I think.
Good questions though. You are really earning those hugs!!

