|
Seductress
|
05-16-2013, 08:33 AM
I think the revision is a LOT better than the original, certainly made it a teasing piece. Overall I'd say it is a little vague, its a well furnished concept but I'd love to see you apply this kind of linguistic style to something more specific. Not the most constructive comment ever so sorry.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Seductress - by C.M.C. - 05-15-2013, 02:42 PM
RE: Seductress - by Brownlie - 05-15-2013, 03:11 PM
RE: Seductress - by C.M.C. - 05-15-2013, 03:32 PM
RE: Seductress - by tectak - 05-15-2013, 07:27 PM
RE: Seductress - by C.M.C. - 05-15-2013, 08:36 PM
RE: Seductress - by Brownlie - 05-15-2013, 11:19 PM
RE: Seductress - by tectak - 05-15-2013, 11:25 PM
RE: Seductress - by Brownlie - 05-15-2013, 11:43 PM
RE: Seductress - by C.M.C. - 05-16-2013, 12:12 AM
RE: Seductress - by Catcherin - 05-16-2013, 08:33 AM
|
