Retrospective Losses edit 1. Input milo.
#13
(03-18-2013, 09:16 PM)tectak Wrote:  
(03-18-2013, 08:28 PM)milo Wrote:  
(03-18-2013, 08:19 PM)tectak Wrote:  
(03-18-2013, 09:24 AM)milo Wrote:  
(03-18-2013, 08:27 AM)tectak Wrote:  Hi milo,
Many thanks for the insight though I would argue Poe's corner in denying you the didactic definitionSmile Nonetheless, if you felt informed by the piece I guess it is an unwanted bonus for you and a revelation for me!
Nouny? Yes, I concur but many is one less. I could trawl through this and scoop up the red herrings but I think I may catch too many sprats....the bigger fish are usually adjectival; I over fished them long ago. Fuck these rubber metaphors, they won't leave me alone.
Sorry...sorry..what were we saying...ah yes....the whilst and the nor. Again, I can take your point, but what was it? The useage is correct but awkward? I will look to change both....a challenge...what to do? Incorrect but facile, perhapsSmile
You have given me some great insight to my own failings in this one...thank you. I have no excuses...I disagree with you only on your understanding of what constitutes didactic verse....this piece is opinionated in my opinionSmile but should in no way be considered informative! Do you write poetry, by the by?
Best,
tectak
yah, for nouns I just mean abstractions. I love nouns. Strong concrete nouns. There aren't a lot of those here. All of the abstraction makes it hard for me to relate.

I do write poetry, thank you.

milo
Hi milo,
I think I shall wait until I can establish your credentials through your poetic efforts...otherwise I may shout dilettante too soonSmile
I confess, when you said nouns I thought you meant nouns...but you meant, er, well um? I am no longer sure of anything. When I said sure I meant uncertain. Huh?
You are still right on the "nor" point. I will change it.
Best,
tectak
I stated abstractions early in the post then listed the abstract nouns. If there was confusion the fault was mine. mea culpa.

I meant abstract nouns. abstractions.

As far as credentials, I wouldn't think you would need credentials to read and comment?

milo
Hi milo,
No. You are quite right, you do not need credentials to comment...but you do if you want to be taken any notice ofSmile
Best,
tectak
I missed the suggestion to post credentials before commenting somehow. Thank you for pointing this out. I suppose all of those many, many abstractions are now concrete until I link a resume?

Thank you for your assistance.

milo
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Retrospective Losses - by Leanne - 03-18-2013, 04:15 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by tectak - 03-18-2013, 04:19 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by Leanne - 03-18-2013, 04:21 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by tectak - 03-18-2013, 04:23 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by milo - 03-18-2013, 07:46 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by tectak - 03-18-2013, 08:27 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by milo - 03-18-2013, 09:24 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by tectak - 03-18-2013, 08:19 PM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by milo - 03-18-2013, 08:28 PM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by tectak - 03-18-2013, 09:16 PM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by milo - 03-19-2013, 05:52 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by tectak - 03-19-2013, 06:08 AM
RE: Retrospective Losses - by milo - 03-19-2013, 06:10 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!