Lisa
#19
(12-29-2012, 09:16 AM)billy Wrote:  sorry i got back to this late. 1st off, great edit. you elevated the original poem by a myriad of levels. one thing i noticed are the 'tenses' i could not
transitions to i see instead of i saw

excellent edit. now it clear, the pain the church values, the morality or lack of it they teach us, how dirty we or it is. i think you did the first part or the poem the better service with the edit and wish you could have been a forceful in the 2nd part. but to get what have so far, from what you had is surprisingly good. i wasn't expecting the bravery of a large edit.
i wasn't a lover of the .....'s but that's just me Big Grin

thanks for the effort and the read.
I fixed some of the problems you found, and i will take another look at the latter half, i may end up rewriting the whole thing to incorperate more of the larger story, or just define what i have here now.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Lisa - by smakpopy - 12-27-2012, 02:51 PM
RE: untitled - by Jae Mc Donnell - 12-27-2012, 03:53 PM
RE: untitled - by billy - 12-27-2012, 05:26 PM
RE: untitled - by tectak - 12-28-2012, 10:30 AM
RE: untitled - by smakpopy - 12-28-2012, 11:18 AM
RE: untitled - by tectak - 12-28-2012, 06:16 PM
RE: untitled - by smakpopy - 12-28-2012, 02:03 AM
RE: untitled - by Jae Mc Donnell - 12-28-2012, 05:26 AM
RE: untitled - by billy - 12-28-2012, 08:15 AM
RE: untitled - by smakpopy - 12-28-2012, 11:04 AM
RE: untitled - by tectak - 12-29-2012, 01:25 AM
RE: untitled - by billy - 12-28-2012, 11:17 AM
RE: untitled - by smakpopy - 12-28-2012, 11:24 AM
RE: Lisa - by billy - 12-28-2012, 11:21 AM
RE: untitled - by rowens - 12-28-2012, 11:34 AM
RE: Lisa - by Jae Mc Donnell - 12-28-2012, 11:42 AM
RE: Lisa - by smakpopy - 12-28-2012, 11:59 AM
RE: Lisa - by billy - 12-29-2012, 09:16 AM
RE: Lisa - by smakpopy - 12-29-2012, 11:34 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!