11-10-2012, 05:56 PM
Did you say LESS social securities?
Less people will get less of the money that was forcibly taken from them, if that's what you mean.
SS barely passed when it was introduced. It was wildly unpopular (just like the erroneously named universal health care bill). The American people were told they would get back every cent that was put in. That quickly became bs. SS went from `1 account to 3, and just about everything under the sun the govt can't afford is siphoned out of that third acct.
Health care is the same. The insurance companies are NOT footing the bill, I don't know where you got that info. The initial effects are already causing companies to freeze hiring because their costs rose between 13% and 22% last year. It also gave the IRS the ability to monitor private bank accounts, seizing assets, 401ks, and private property of those who refuse or cannot afford to become insured. That is a major over stepping over govt boundaries (the IRS is unconstitutional to begin with) as well as a loss of civil liberties.
Care is already being rationed, with a panel deciding what tests, treatments, and medications will be available to citizens. This is NOT better care, it is not even humane care.
I don't know why you felt sorry for Romney. He won the popular vote. The electoral college was a different matter.
I agree with Todd. Both parties are pretty much one and the same these days.
Less people will get less of the money that was forcibly taken from them, if that's what you mean.
SS barely passed when it was introduced. It was wildly unpopular (just like the erroneously named universal health care bill). The American people were told they would get back every cent that was put in. That quickly became bs. SS went from `1 account to 3, and just about everything under the sun the govt can't afford is siphoned out of that third acct.
Health care is the same. The insurance companies are NOT footing the bill, I don't know where you got that info. The initial effects are already causing companies to freeze hiring because their costs rose between 13% and 22% last year. It also gave the IRS the ability to monitor private bank accounts, seizing assets, 401ks, and private property of those who refuse or cannot afford to become insured. That is a major over stepping over govt boundaries (the IRS is unconstitutional to begin with) as well as a loss of civil liberties.
Care is already being rationed, with a panel deciding what tests, treatments, and medications will be available to citizens. This is NOT better care, it is not even humane care.
I don't know why you felt sorry for Romney. He won the popular vote. The electoral college was a different matter.
I agree with Todd. Both parties are pretty much one and the same these days.
PS. If you can, try your hand at giving some of the others a bit of feedback. If you already have, thanks, can you do some more?