|..

[Philatone]

hey parakleseos

some thoughts

Interchum, your pictures could not evolve and ...the very first word sends me a progressively more confusing trip; i'm really not sure how i'm supposed to take the word
bone collection is humdrum. (Lots of people grow up on farms.)...having trouble drawing connections between these apparent associations. i'm seeing a critique of an artist stuck on the same, repetitive subject matter. think a stronger title could really give me more to work with
Sure I'm bound to like what they scratched up in Andahuaylillas, but
let's be serious anthropologist bafflers for the purpose of motile product placement.

I'm not even sure today that for example
[ind]-The comedian convicted of sexually assaulting his young daughter
[ind][ind]appeared outside the Auckland District Court. (And I have photographs of that.) ...why does this detail get 2 lines and the others only one?
[ind]-Gu Kailai will receive a fair trial for the murder of Briton Neil Heywood.
[ind]-The Batman mythology has been hurt by the Aurora massacre.
...an interesting tangent, but i'm not sure if the wealth of details and examples are needed; they pulled the poem in a direction I don't think it is headed. the poem seems focused on the artist, not the speaker's own issues. in fact, the next line even confirms that this series of thoughts is not related for me ( "That's not the problem of your art")

That's not the problem of your art, I very well suppose with my
stereotypical 1890s capitalist and Un Incroyable wearing such a hat as early as 1796....what hat? i'm guessing it's a symbol more than anything
But what is? Something about the dark and being
imaginative with a certain festering low talent for artisanship, sure, but
I meanwhile can only play this game which involves
answering questions or solving puzzles usually for money and/or prizes however
really for nothing and it's a lousy game perhaps. ...the game part eluded me. perhaps the speaker is a curator for the art?

God, never mind.

Once again you're looking at me as though this is a baffling type of circular intersection or junction in which road traffic is slowed and flows almost continuously in one direction around a central island out to several exits and onto various intersecting roads, and I can't/won't be bothered I just No...i don't understand the "bothered" part. for such a rant, to end abruptly feels a bit deflating (though that may be the intention for the piece)

i like the 'conversational' tone, but it strikes me as too stream-of-consciousness in a way, though it is a bit controlled. it's interesting because i feel as though i know more about the subject than the speaker.

i apologize, but a lot of this is going over my head at the moment