07-27-2012, 11:03 AM
i'd say taking the life of an animal by any means is a violent, act. to say otherwise intimates that it''s okay to not only slaughter,, but mistreat them at the same time. if you commit an act of violence you can't then claim to be non-violent i agree.
ghandhi promoted the action without violence he was a pacifist who epitomised non violence. but his cry fro inaction cause more violence that could e measured
ghandhi promoted the action without violence he was a pacifist who epitomised non violence. but his cry fro inaction cause more violence that could e measured
